Just remember, love is life and hate is living death...

The Community

*
Treat your life for what it's worth, and live for every breath.
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length

News:

2026-02-11 Eight years and still going strong!
2025-01-02 Happy New Year! This little experiment of ours has been rolling for almost 7 years now!
2024-02-11 Six years!
2023-02-11 The Five Year Plan continues!
2022-02-11 Four years, Happy Birthday to the Community!
2021-02-11 Three years, how the time flies!
2020-02-11 Two years and counting!
2019-02-11 Happy 1st Anniversary to the Community!
2018-11-10 RIP our brother, founding member, mr. Billy Underdog :-(
2018-06-22 Discman says, "Reminds me of the good ol days. LOL"
2018-02-11 The Community arises from the Internet!


  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Posts
  • Login
  • Register

  • The Community >>
  • ROCK AND ROLL! >>
  • All Them Other Guys >>
  • Beatles or Stones?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: 1 [2]

Author Topic: Beatles or Stones?  (Read 15256 times)

Billy Underdog

  • Norse Troll Slayer
  • I'm with the band
  • ****
  • Posts: 2222
  • Awesomeness: 37
  • It's not my fault i'm better than you
    • View Profile
Re: Beatles or Stones?
« Reply #15 on: July 11, 2018, 02:48:25 PM »
Quote from: Zzzptm on July 11, 2018, 08:48:11 AM

Now here's where I may be parting company with some on the Beatles side of the equation... I actually like the George Harrison songs better than the Lennon/McCartney ones, and that was from before I was aware of the composers.

You're not the only one. And not only for Abbey Road either, but every album, including Yellow Submarine with the Sgt. Peppers throw-away Only A Northern Song.
All Things Must Pass is also a great testament for how many great songs the Beatles could have had if Lennon/McCartney weren't so protective about their song inputs.
Logged
Til árs ok friðar ok forn siðr

Think before you speak?!?! COWARD!!!

Intolerant? Me? Nooooo....

JSTHECONQUEROR

  • Guest
Re: Beatles or Stones?
« Reply #16 on: July 11, 2018, 11:13:51 PM »
Beatles were more innovative and groundbreaking. I hate the early stuff. Around, Help is where my only interest lies. that being said, I like the Rolling Stones especially with Brian Jones. It just rolls of the tongue that way!
Logged

discman69

  • Guest
Re: Beatles or Stones?
« Reply #17 on: July 12, 2018, 06:39:25 AM »
I am the same way ZZZ. Something is easily in my top 5 Beatles songs. I actually just made a playlist called The Rolling Beatles. 25 Beatle songs, 25 Rolling Stones songs.
Logged

Zzzptm

  • Wild card! Yeehaw!
  • BeNice
  • Producer/Engineer
  • *
  • Posts: 15412
  • Awesomeness: 31
  • The Dude abides.
    • View Profile
Re: Beatles or Stones?
« Reply #18 on: July 12, 2018, 09:13:24 AM »
Quote from: Billy Underdog on July 11, 2018, 02:48:25 PM
Quote from: Zzzptm on July 11, 2018, 08:48:11 AM

Now here's where I may be parting company with some on the Beatles side of the equation... I actually like the George Harrison songs better than the Lennon/McCartney ones, and that was from before I was aware of the composers.

You're not the only one. And not only for Abbey Road either, but every album, including Yellow Submarine with the Sgt. Peppers throw-away Only A Northern Song.
All Things Must Pass is also a great testament for how many great songs the Beatles could have had if Lennon/McCartney weren't so protective about their song inputs.

On a side note, Billy, this is not helping us defend against Typhon's assertion that we are the same person.
Logged
"Yeah, well... you know... that's just, like, uh... your opinion, man." - The Dude

"Think! It ain't illegal yet!" - George Clinton

Typhon

  • Guest
Re: Beatles or Stones?
« Reply #19 on: July 12, 2018, 11:05:36 AM »
Quote from: Zzzptm on July 12, 2018, 09:13:24 AM
Quote from: Billy Underdog on July 11, 2018, 02:48:25 PM
Quote from: Zzzptm on July 11, 2018, 08:48:11 AM

Now here's where I may be parting company with some on the Beatles side of the equation... I actually like the George Harrison songs better than the Lennon/McCartney ones, and that was from before I was aware of the composers.

You're not the only one. And not only for Abbey Road either, but every album, including Yellow Submarine with the Sgt. Peppers throw-away Only A Northern Song.
All Things Must Pass is also a great testament for how many great songs the Beatles could have had if Lennon/McCartney weren't so protective about their song inputs.

On a side note, Billy, this is not helping us defend against Typhon's assertion that we are the same person.

Stop talking to yourself.
Logged

Billy Underdog

  • Norse Troll Slayer
  • I'm with the band
  • ****
  • Posts: 2222
  • Awesomeness: 37
  • It's not my fault i'm better than you
    • View Profile
Re: Beatles or Stones?
« Reply #20 on: July 12, 2018, 11:08:12 AM »
Quote from: Typhon on July 12, 2018, 11:05:36 AM
Quote from: Zzzptm on July 12, 2018, 09:13:24 AM
Quote from: Billy Underdog on July 11, 2018, 02:48:25 PM
Quote from: Zzzptm on July 11, 2018, 08:48:11 AM

Now here's where I may be parting company with some on the Beatles side of the equation... I actually like the George Harrison songs better than the Lennon/McCartney ones, and that was from before I was aware of the composers.

You're not the only one. And not only for Abbey Road either, but every album, including Yellow Submarine with the Sgt. Peppers throw-away Only A Northern Song.
All Things Must Pass is also a great testament for how many great songs the Beatles could have had if Lennon/McCartney weren't so protective about their song inputs.

On a side note, Billy, this is not helping us defend against Typhon's assertion that we are the same person.

Stop talking to yourself.

NO! Gotta feed my multiple personalities!  >:(
Logged
Til árs ok friðar ok forn siðr

Think before you speak?!?! COWARD!!!

Intolerant? Me? Nooooo....

Zzzptm

  • Wild card! Yeehaw!
  • BeNice
  • Producer/Engineer
  • *
  • Posts: 15412
  • Awesomeness: 31
  • The Dude abides.
    • View Profile
Re: Beatles or Stones?
« Reply #21 on: July 12, 2018, 01:21:04 PM »
Dammit, Billy, you're not helping me! Er... you! Errrr... us!

Anyway, back on track... I think the main difference between the Stones and The Beatles is in their influences. The Beatles are more Elvis, Buddy Holly, Little Richard, and the pop side of things, with the band covering tunes from musicals and stuff in their early BBC gigs. That fed right into Paul's tendency to write "songs for grannies" as John called them.

Meanwhile, the Stones were more Howlin' Wolf, BB King, Muddy Waters, that bluesier side of the spectrum that bands like The Yardbirds were getting into.
Logged
"Yeah, well... you know... that's just, like, uh... your opinion, man." - The Dude

"Think! It ain't illegal yet!" - George Clinton

  • Print
Pages: 1 [2]
« previous next »
  • The Community >>
  • ROCK AND ROLL! >>
  • All Them Other Guys >>
  • Beatles or Stones?
 

CREDITS


  • SMF 2.0.19 | SMF © 2021, Simple Machines
  • XHTML
  • RSS
  • WAP2


Copyright 2011-2018. All Rights Reserved.

Designed by Zzzptm.